71. What does the writer think of the scientists who are directly funded by weight-loss companies?
- They are not really experts in the field.
- Their studies are not based on scientific principles.
- They dramatize and exaggerate their studies.
- They don't know what "overweight" and "obese" mean.
72. How do critics dispute the idea that obesity is an epidemic in America?
- By proving that some scientists are funded by the weight-loss industry.
- By disputing that 60% of Americans will die of weight-related diseases.
- By disputing the idea that obesity reduces a person's lifespan.
- By looking at death rates caused by previous epidemics.
73. Which of the following would the critics if Olshansky and Allison dispute?
- That many illnesses are caused by obesity.
- That people in developed countries are getting fatter.
- The seriousness of obesity.
- That money can influence science.
74. It is implied in the final paragraph that ____.
- science is not as objective as people may think
- scientists habitually create false data to satisfy their employers
- any scientists funded by the weight-loss industry are corrupt
- political scientists understand the obesity issue better than natural scientists
75. The author writes the text in order to ____.
- suggest that being obese is not a problem
- suggest that obesity is not as big a problem as many believe
- point out that many scientists make money from studying obesity
- point out that several diseases are caused by obesity
(Reference keys.)