Phone

What has the telephone done to us, or for us, in the hundred years of its existence? A few effects suggest themselves at once. It has saved lives by getting rapid word of illness, injury, or fire from remote places. By joining with the elevator to make possible the multi-story residence or office building, it has made possible—for better or worse—the modern city. By bringing about a great leap in the speed and ease with which information moves from place to place it has greatly accelerated the rate of scientific and technological changes and growth in industry. Beyond doubt it has seriously weakened if not killed the ancient art of letter-writing. It has made living alone possible for persons with normal social impulses; by so doing it has played a role in one of the greatest social changes of this century, the breakup of the multi-generational household. It has made the war chillingly more efficient than formerly. Perhaps, though not provably, it has prevented wars that might have arisen out of international misunderstanding caused by written communication. Or perhaps—again not provably—by magnifying and extending irrational personal conflicts based on voice contact, it has caused wars. Certainly it has extended the scope of human conflicts, since it impartially disseminates the useful knowledge of scientists and the nonsense of the ignorant, the affection of the affectionate and the malice of the malicious.

Short Answer Questions

1. What's the main idea of this passage?
2. According to the passage, what's the general function of the telephone?
3. The telephone has intensified conflicts among people, why?
4. Why does the author describe the telephone as impartial?
5. What's the writer's attitude towards the use of the telephone?

(Keys.)